Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8304 (ALL)

KADEER AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/37311/2026 · 2026-09-22

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37311 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA). 2. This writ petition is preferred for the following principal reliefs : "i) Issue a writ, order direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to execute lease deed (lease back) in favour of petitioners in respect of their share in the aforesaid plot no.152 M in pursuance to letter dated 1.11.2015 issued by the respondent no.3. ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents authority not to allot the share of petitioners in the aforesaid plot no152M to any other person. iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents authority not to disturb the possession of petitioners from their share in the aforesaid plot no.152M. (iv) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents authority to consider and decide the representation of petitioners dated 20.04.2026 in accordance with law." 3. The petitioners claim lease-back of their land, admeasuring 0.1150 hectares, situated in Village-Khanpur, Tehsil-Sadar, District Gautam Budh Nagar. They have also sought a direction to the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), respondent No.4, to decide their application dated 20.4.2026. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Mishra, Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Kadeer And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority has no objection to the said relief. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and, as the petitioners have confined their prayer to a direction for expeditious disposal of their applications in accordance with law, with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioners may file an exhaustive application before respondent No.4- GNIDA within two weeks from today. It is expected that, if there is no other legal impediment, the grievance of the petitioners shall be redressed within a further period of three months from the date of filing of such application. September 23, 2026 GS WRIC No. 37311 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad