[2026:RJ-JP:22403] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 822/2026 1. Nikkee, D/o Jungliram, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village Peepli, Tehsil Mundawar, Police Station Mundawar, District Alwar (At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 2. Siddhant Kumar Yadav, Son Of Shri Jitendra Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Balluwas, Tehsil Mundawar, Police Station Mundawar, District Alwar (At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 5. Jungliram S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Peepli, Tehsil Mundawar, Police Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 6. Krishan S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Peepli, Tehsil Mundawar, Police Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 7. Leelu Ram S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Peepli, Tehsil Mundawar, Police Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). 8. Karan Singh S/o Samundra, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Renagar, Police Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 26/05/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:22403] (2 of 3) [CRLW-822/2026] 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Amended cause title filed by the petitioner is taken on record. 3. With the consent of both the parties, the arguments have been heard and the criminal writ petition is being decided finally. 4.This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 18.05.2026 at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 8. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:22403] (3 of 3) [CRLW-822/2026] 9. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 10. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 11. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 12. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J 208/Ritu