[2026:RJ-JP:22442] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7378/2026 Rahul Soni S/o Lalit Soni, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Binoba Marg Jobat, Police Station Jobat, District Alirajpur (Madhyapradesh) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalu Singh Sisodiya Mr. Ram Pratap Deora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 26/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.327/2025 registered at Police Station Jhalawar Sadar, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 331(4), 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of the disclosure statement made by the principal offender Karan Bhabar. He again submits that co-accused Chetan Bhai, Hardik Kumar and Raj Soni have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.04.2026.n The case of the petitioner is akin to them. Petitioner is behind the [2026:RJ-JP:22442] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7378/2026] bars since 13.04.2026 though three cases have been reported against him, however, in all cases he is already on bail. Charge- sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rahul Soni S/o Lalit Soni, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/76