UKHC010119082026 2026:UHC:6042 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No.1774 of 2026 20 July, 2026 Gram Vikas Lekha Sangh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, learned counsel for petitioner- Association. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned D.A.G. for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) Petitioner-Association, at the outset, wants not to press relief No.i to the writ petition, whereby, Office Memorandum dated 01.08.2025 was challenged. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press so far as it relates to relief No.‘i’. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner moved a supplementary affidavit, by which, she has disclosed the name of Members of petitioner-Association and Court fees submitted by each of them. Supplementary affidavit filed by petitioner is taken on record. Misc. Application (IA/2/2026) stands disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner limits her prayer only to the extent for a direction to respondent No.2-Director, Directorate of Departmental Accounts, Dalanwala, Dehradun, to decide the representations moved by petitioner-Association within a stipulated period in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the latest representations have been made by the petitioner- UKHC010119082026 2026:UHC:6042 2 Association on 10.09.2025 and 31.03.2026 (Annexure Nos.14 and 15 to the writ petition), whereby, the petitioner filed objection to the tentative joint seniority list dated 01.08.2025 in respect of Accountants working in different department of the State except department of treasury. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner made an innocuous prayer that if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representations dated 10.09.2025 and 31.03.2026 (Annexure Nos.14 and 15 to the writ petition) within a stipulated period, the ends of justice would be met. 6. There is no objection from the side of learned State Counsel if such a direction is issued. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of, with a direction to respondent No.2-Director, Directorate of Departmental Accounts, Dalanwala, Dehradun, to take decision on representations moved by petitioner-Association dated 10.09.2025 and 31.03.2026 (Annexure Nos.14 and 15 to the writ petition), by a well reasoned order, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. 8. Pending application stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.07.2026 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9 f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83 D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2026.07.20 17:06:45 +05'30'