[2026:RJ-JP:11110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11898/2023 Prabhu Ram Soni Son Of Shri Ramchandra Soni, R/o 71, Om Shiv Nagar, Kalwad Road, Jhotwada Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Govt. Secretary, Medical And Health Department Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Joint Chief Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-3) Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Rajasthan 4. Mahesh Chand Soni, 10, Raghav Sadan, Near Gurudwara Polo Ground, Ramleela Maidan, Sikar ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10339/2023 Prabhu Ram Soni Son Of Shri Ramchandra Soni, Resident Of 71, Om Shiv Nagar, Kalwad Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Govt Secretary, Medical And Health Department Rajasthan Government, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Joint Govt Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-3) Department, Rajasthan Govt., Govt Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Rajasthan. 4. Mahesh Chand Soni, 10, Radhav Sadan, Gurudwara, Polo Ground Ke Paas, Ramleela Maidan, Sikar. 5. Director, Pension Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Treasurer, Treasury And Accounts Department Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Bhandari Dr. T.N. Sharma with Mr. Shivang Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Verma on behalf of Mt. Archit Bohra, AGC [2026:RJ-JP:11110] (2 of 2) [CW-11898/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that in the light of order dated 12.08.2024 passed by Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.226/2024 (Smt. Punam Soni Vs. Mahesh Chandra Soni & Ors.), cause of action for pursuing these writ petition does not survive. 2. Aforesaid fact has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of above, these writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/68-69