CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 Mohamed fazith S/o.Mohamed Rafiq 32/69, Bagaduralam street Pudur Elayangudi Taluk Sivagangai district . ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by its, The Inspector of Police, D1-Triplicane Police Station, Chennai City. Cr.No.Not Known of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to order enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. Not known of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Saravana Perumal For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296, 118(1) and 351 of BNS, in Crime No.Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner bit the finger of the defacto complainant, as a result of which the figure got severed. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the fourth anticipatory bail application. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the severity of the allegation against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that it is not an appropriate stage to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, it would sent wrong signal to the society. Hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police, D1-Triplicane Police Station, Chennai City. Cr.No.Not Known of 2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 10036 of 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis