Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8295 (GAU)

SAILEN KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/1934/2026 · 2026-06-11

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010114112026 2026:GAU-AS:8434 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1934/2026 SAILEN KUMAR SHARMA SON OF LATE MANIRAM SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 4, TANGLA TOWN, P.O. TANGLA, DISTRICT UDALGURI BTC, ASSAM, PIN-784521. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ASSAM ASSAM WATER CENTRE BASISTHA GUWAHATI-781029. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAMRUP RURAL WATER RESOURCES DIVISIO FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUWAHATI WEST WATER RESOURCES DIVISION BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI-781009 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S SARMA, MS. M SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC. WATER RESOURCE DEPTT., Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/5513/2025 SAILEN KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE MANI RAM SHARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 4 TANGLA TOWN P.O. TANGLA IN THE DIST. UDALGURI (BTC) PIN-784521. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ASSAM ASSAM WATER CENTRE BASISTHA GUWAHATI-781029. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAMRUP RURAL WATER RESOURCES DIVISIO FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUWAHATI WEST WATER RESOURCES DIVISION BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI-781009. ------------ Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. S Sarma Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. R Deka B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 12.06.2026 Page No.# 3/3 This is an application filed by the applicant, who is the petitioner in the accompanying writ petition to implead the Union of India as well as the Brahmaputra Board as respondent Nos.4 and 5 respectively to the accompanying writ petition. 2. Taking into account that the claim made by the writ petitioner arises out of a project which is centrally sponsored, it is the requirement that the Union of India as well as the Brahmaputra Board ought to be made parties to the accompanying writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the following parties are impleaded as respondent Nos.4 and 5 respectively to the accompanying writ petition: (i). The Union of India, represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Jal Shakti Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001; (ii). The Brahmaputra Board, represented by the Chairman, Brahmaputra Board, Basistha, Guwahati, Assam 781029. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner shall file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7(seven) days from today, and the Registry on the basis of the instant order and the fresh memo of parties shall make necessary correction in the cause-title of the accompanying writ petition and update the same in the CIS. 5. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant