IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11150 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1299 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Babloo Sao @ Bablu Saw S/o Late Kameshwar Sao R/o Village - Mahammadpur, Police Station - Barh, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 21 and 22 (b) of the NDPS Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the police received confidential information that contraband substances were being transported in a tempo. Acting upon such information, the police reached near Gur Ki Mandi, whereupon one person, on seeing the police, attempted to flee from the said tempo but was apprehended. Upon search of the tempo, alleged contraband articles, namely Leegesic injections (750 ampoules), silent injections (2 ml, 1,400 ampoules), and Avil (2 ml, 590 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11150 of 2026(4) dt.09-04-2026 2/3 ampoules), were recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that from a perusal of the seizure list, it would transpire that no contraband has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner; rather, the alleged recovery has been made from the tempo. It is further submitted that the said tempo does not belong to the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also contended that the alleged recovery, though more than small quantity, is much less than the commercial quantity, and as such, the stringent provisions are not attracted in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025 and has no criminal antecedent having no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 1299 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11150 of 2026(4) dt.09-04-2026 3/3 Principal District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, NDPS, Patna. Jagdish/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T