NIRANJAN CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WP.ST/70/2021 · 2026-02-26
Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8287 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8287 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Ct. No.4 D/L 26.02.2026 (Naba) 08 W.P.S.T. 70 of 2021
Niranjan Chakraborty Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the State
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. State is represented.
3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion nobody was present to represent the petitioner.
4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)