Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010082842026 2026:GAU-AS:8630 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/886/2026 JAHIDUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O ABDUL BASID @ BASER ALI R/O SIJUBARI, HATIGAON CHARIALI,GUWAHATI-781038, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM. 2: NAZMA BEGUM D/O ABDUL BASID @ BASER ALI W/O ROFIQUL ISLAM R/O CHAMPUPARA PATHAR P.O. PACHIM SAMARIA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP PIN-78113 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. J ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Page No.# 2/3 Date : 16.06.2026. Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, the learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing on behalf of the State respondent. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre- arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, (1) Jahidul Islam and (2) Nazma Begum, who are apprehending arrest in connection with the Hatigaon P.S. Case No. 72/2026, registered under Sections 61/316(2)/318(4) /351(2) of the BNS, 2023. The case diary is received and perused the same. It is submitted by Mr. Abdullah, the learned counsel that the present accused petitioners after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 04.05.2026, appeared before the I.O. and extended their cooperation with the investigation of this case. He further submitted that the present petitioners are still ready and willing to extend their cooperation in further investigation of this case if needed, if they are provided with the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Mr. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P., Assam submitted in this regard that from the case diary as well as from the note of the I.O. it reveals that prior to the order of interim pre-arrest bail, the petitioners have also appeared before the I.O. and their statements were recorded and hence, subsequent statement was not recorded by the I.O., though they appeared before the I.O. after obtaining the interim order. Page No.# 3/3 Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and the materials available in the case diary and the fact that the accused petitioners have already extended their cooperation, this Court is of the opinion that their custodial interrogation may not be necessary for the interest of investigation. In view of this, the order of interim pre-arrest bail granted to the accused petitioner on 04.05.2026, is hereby made absolute with same terms and conditions. With the above observation, the present bail petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant