Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8284 (AP)

B V L PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23040/2021 · 2026-08-10

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010375382021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23040 of 2021 Between: 1. B V L PRASAD, S/O B ADI SESHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. LAB BOY, R/O 4-12-16, AMARAVATI ROAD, GUNTUR 2. A NAGA RAJU, S/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. LAB BOY, R/O DR.NO. 3-10-6, OLD PATTABHIPURAM GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. M V S KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O MADHUSUDHANA RAJU , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. ATTENDER, R/O AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK MASTAN VALI, S/O SHAIK SAIDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. ATTENDER, R/O OLD PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. P RAMA DEVI, W/O P CHITTIBABU, AGED ABOUT 56, OCC. LAB ATTENDANT, R/O SRINIVASA RAO PET GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. B MADHAVI, W/O P KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. LAB ATTENDANT, R/O 4TH LANE , A T AGRAHARAM GUNTUR. 7. J RAVINDRA PRASAD, ,S/O BRAHMAIAH, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC. LAB BOY, R/O OLD PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. A SAI KUMARI, C/O D DATTATRYULU, AGED 55YEARS, OCC. LAB ATTENDANT, R/O 4TH LINE A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. R ANNAPURNA DEVI,, W/O CH SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, OCC. LAB ATTENDANT, R/O NEAR BALAKUTEER, SYAMALA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. B KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O B VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. WATCHMAN, R/O 2ND LANE 2 NGGOS COLONY, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 11. M RAMESH KUMAR,, S/O M PANDURANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. RECORD ASSISTANT R/O 6/12,BRODIPET GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE HINDU COLLEGE, , REP BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 2nd Respondent herein passed the proceedings Rc.No.105/Admn.II/PAC/2017 dated 15.04.2024 rejecting the request of the Petitioners for regularization of their services into Grant in aid posts contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22-04.1994 2) declare the action of the respondents in failure to take further steps to regularizing the services of the Petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22- 04.1994 inspite of being found eligible and qualified pursuant to the proceedings of the Respondent No.2 vide Lr.Rc.No.557/Admm.VI -2- 2006, dated 23.02.2007, 12.10.2017, 10.05.2019 and 11.06.2021 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to pay salaries attached to the posts to the Petitioners from the date of proposals dated 03.12.2006 by setting aside the proceedings Rc.No.105/Admn.II/PAC/2017 dated 15.04.2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent and pass appropriate order as may deem fit and proper in 3 the circumstances of the case. Main Prayer amended/substituted as per Court Order dated 02.02.2026 vide IA No.1 of 2024 in WP No.23040 of 2021. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23040 of 2021 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed for regularisation of the petitioners’ services. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the issue in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this in W.P.No.16832 of 2020 dated 23.07.2026 and he would request this Court to pass same order in the present Writ Petition also. 2. As the reliefs in both the Writ Petitions are identical, the present Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the order dated 23.07.2026 in W.P.No.16832 of 2020 and the respondents are directed to regularise the services of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Office is directed to attach a copy of the order dated 23.07.2026 in W.P.No.16832 of 2020 to this order. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 11.08.2026 siva 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23040 of 2021 Date: 11.08.2026 siva