[2026:RJ-JP:22763] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6165/2026 Umar Bhai Urf Tailor S/o Mehboob Bhai, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Meat Market, Talab Pada Baran Police Station Kotwali Baran District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar, SHO Mangrol, Barah HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 1. Date of conclusion of arguments 27.05.2026 2. Date on which the order was reserved 27.05.2026 3. Whether the full order or only operative part is pronounced Full 4. Date of pronouncement 01.06.2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. by the petitioner Umar Bhai Urf Tailor S/o Mehboob Bhai, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.36/2026 dated 03.02.2026 registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21 and 30 of the NDPS Act, 1985 and Section 27 of Drugs and Cos- metics Act, 1940 after his bail application was rejected by the learned Trial Court by order dated 07.04.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no recov- ery was made from the possession of the present petitioner and [2026:RJ-JP:22763] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6165/2026] the allegations against him are only of Section 8/29 as recovery was made from the other persons. Counsel further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent of NDPS Act against the petitioner. In view thereof, he prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor along with the Investigation Offi- cer as present strongly opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This Court, while considering the bail application of the co- accused Hemchand @ Hemant, has considered the similar alleg- ation and dismissed the said bail application. The case of the present petitioner is also similar to the co-accused Hemchand @ Hemant and therefore, looking to the seriousness of the allegation and the recovery as made by the police in the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail. 6. Consequently, the instant bail application preferred on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed, however the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording of the state- ments of Investigating Officer and Seizing Officer. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 50/RAHUL KUMAR