Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:526 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 1175 of 2025
---------
1. Sukru Kharia, Aged about 67 Years, S/o- Late Dharu Kharia, R/o- Village Jago Pahar, P.O. Morabadi, P.S. Bariatu, District Ranchi. 2. Gopal Manjhi, Aged about, 65 Years, S/o- Late Jagan Manjhi, R/o- 79, Old A.G. Colony, Kadru, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Argora, District Ranchi. ....Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand:
2. The Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Jharkhand, Having its Office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi;
3. Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited having its Office at Engineering Bhawan, H.E.C at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited having its Office at Engineering Bhawan, H.E.C at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 5. The General Manager (Human Resource), Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited having its Office at Engineering Bhawan, H.E.C at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi ....Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Sweta Shukla, A.C. to AAG-II
Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, Advocate
--------- 02/Dated:-09.01.2026
1. The instant application has been preferred for modifications in the judgment dated 16.10.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 396 of 2018 wherein due to inadvertence, there has been some typographical errors which are hereby modified as follows: (i) In the cause title, the name of the father of Petitioner No. 1 has wrongly been typed ‘Late Dharu 1. Kharia’ instead of Late Dharu Kharia; as such, it shall be read as ‘Late Dharu Kharia’. (ii) In the cause title, the office address of Respondent No. 3
2026:JHHC:526 2 has wrongly been typed as ‘office at bevomet Engineering Bhawan’ instead of ‘office at Engineering Bhawan’; as such, the same shall be read as office at Engineering Bhawan. (iii) In Para 2 of the judgment, the date of order in I.A. No. 7152/2025 has wrongly been mentioned as ‘16.06.2026’ instead of 16.06.2025; as such, the same shall be read as
16.06.2025. (iv) In para 16 of the judgment, the date of order in I.A. No. 7152/2025 has wrongly been mentioned as ‘16.06.2026’ instead of 16.06.2025; as such, the same shall be read as
16.06.2025. 2. With the aforesaid modifications in the said judgment dated 16.10.2025 passed in W.P. (S) No. 396 of 2018, the instant application stands allowed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) January 9, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 13/01/2026