Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8279 (ALL)

RAM LAL JAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/41098/2026 · 2026-09-23

Samit Gopal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41098 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Gagan Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mahadeo Singh Chandel, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the record. 3. The present application under Sections 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Ram Lal Jayan with the following prayers: "It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and issue an order or direction to the respondents authority / investigating agency to conduct further investigation or transfer the investigation to other agency in respect of case crime no. 17 of 2025 under section 109(1) 333, 352 and 351(2) BNS and 3 (2) (V) SC./S.T. Act and section 3/25 Arms Act police station Bisanda, District Banda. Pending before the Learned Special Judge (S.C./ST.) Act ADJ Banda and to submit a supplementary charge sheet, under section 193(9) BNSS. Otherwise the applicant shall irreparable loss and injury. And/or pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in fact and circumstances of the case." 4. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application be dismissed as withdrawn as he intends to seek appropriate remedy available to him under law. 5. Prayer is allowed. 6. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. September 24, 2026 M. ARIF Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahadeo Singh Chandel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Samit Gopal,J.) Ram Lal Jayan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad