HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15448 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order passed by Divisional Manager, Railway, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India has submitted that the petitioner has alternative remedy of approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal as the brother of the petitioner was railway employee and his candidature for compassionate appointment has been rejected by the railway authorities. 4. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. September 24, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitin Kharwar, Ramanuj Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Jai Krishna Narain Sharma (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Satyam Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad