Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8273 (CHH)

SURYAKANT SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

ACQA/157/2025 · 2026-03-16

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12603-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 157 of 2025 1 - Suryakant Singh S/o Late Shri Ramkumar Singh Aged About 49 Years R/o Nehru Chowk, Charoda Basti, Police Station- Old Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Purani Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Sukhdev Yadav S/o Ajeet Yadav Aged About 27 Years R/o In Front Of Shivaji Chowk Electricity Office, Charoda, Police Station- Old Bhilai, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Chandrashekhar Sahu S/o Rajaram Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o Charoda Basti, Police Sation- Old Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - Tikendra Sahu S/o Deendayal Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o Charoda Basti, Police Station- Old Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Abhijit Singh S/o Nagendra Singh Aged About 27 Years R/o Charoda Basti, Police Station- Old Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondent No.1/State : Ms. Nandkumari Kashyap, PL Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 17/03/2026 Per Rajani Dubey , J. PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2026.03.17 14:18:49 +0530 2 1. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant on 17.10.2025 and even today, when the matter is called twice, no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant. 2. In these circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Priyanka