[2026:RJ-JP:21637] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6402/2026 Ugma Singh Rawat S/o Shri Gopi Singh Rawat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Kotda Police Station Haribhau Nagar, Ajmer At Present Near Government School, Madarpura, Police Station Alwargate, Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.372/2024 registered at Police Station Krishnaganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 384 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations levelled against the present petitioner are that he allegedly induced the complainant to execute an agreement in respect of the property mentioned in the FIR for a consideration amount of Rs. 20,00,000/-. The alleged transaction pertains to the year 2019, whereas the FIR has been lodged only in the year 2024 after an [2026:RJ-JP:21637] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6402/2026] unexplained delay of about five years. It is an admitted fact that the complainant had been in possession of the said property for the last nearly 50 years and by aforesaid agreement only possession was handed over. It was incumbent upon the purchaser/complainant to verify the title and ownership documents before entering into the transaction; however, the complainant failed to exercise due diligence in this regard. The matter is purely civil in nature. Petitioner is behind the bars since 13.04.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ugma Singh Rawat S/o Shri Gopi Singh Rawat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/60