Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 82674 (MAD)

V. KARUNANITHI v. K.SANTHI

SA/794/2021 · 2026-01-09

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.A.No.794 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S.A.No.794 of 2021 V.Karunanithi S/o.Venkatesan ... Appellant Vs. 1.K.Santhi W/o.Late Kumanan 2.Jothipriya D/o.Late Kumanan 3.Badmasri Lakshmi D/o.Late Kumanan 4.N.Revathi W/o.Natarajaperumal 5.G.Nirmala W/o.Gunasekaran ...Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 04.07.2018 made in A.S.No.7 of 2015 on the file of the Additional District Court, Namakkal confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2013 made in O.S.No.217 of 2008 Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.794 of 2021 on the file of the Sub-Court, Tiruchengode by allowing this Second Appeal. For Appellant : Mr.D.Gopal For Respondents : Mr.B.Mohan for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Shanmugam for R4 & R5 Mr.R.Vivek Advocate Commissioner O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Advocate Commissioner reported that although notice had been issued to both parties, the appellant replied stating his absence from town for a week; consequently, the Commissioner was unable to execute the warrant. 2.This Court dismissed the appeal on 09.01.2026, finding no merit after a full consideration of the facts. The Court expresses its strong dissatisfaction with the conduct of the appellant, an Advocate by profession, who has shown an unwillingness to settle the dispute or restore the property to the respondents, who are the widow and minor daughters of the appellant's late brother, Kumanan. As the appeal stands dismissed as stated supra, the warrant issued to the Advocate Commissioner is hereby withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the respondents Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.794 of 2021 to initiate execution proceedings for the final decree before the competent Court. If any such application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the same within a period of three months. 3.Since the respondents have already paid the Advocate Commissioner's fee, the appellant is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 25,000/- towards the Advocate Commissioner’s fee. 25.02.2026 pam To 1.The Additional District Court, Namakkal. 2.The Sub-Court, Tiruchengode. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.794 of 2021 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. pam S.A.No.794 of 2021 25.02.2026 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis