Ram Bodh Yadav @ Ram Bodh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./8090/2026 · 2026-03-31
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8266 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8266 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8090 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2019 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ======================================================
1. Ram Bodh Yadav @ Ram Bodh Kumar Yadav S/o- Prayag Yadav @ Ram Prakash Yadav @ Pragas Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
2. Durgesh Yadav @ Durgesh Kumar S/o- Prayag Yadav @ Ram Prakash Yadav @ Pragas Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
3. Dinesh Yadav S/o- Sukan Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
4. Vijay Yadav S/o- Amrit Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
5. Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Yada S/o- Prakash Yadav @ Prayag Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
6. Ram Chandra Yadav S/o- Late Ram Sewak Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani
7. Batohi Yadav S/o- Ramashish Yadav Village- Kamalabari, Dhouli Tole, PS- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to Petitioner No. 6, namely Ram Chandra Yadav, as during pendency of this case, Petitioner No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8090 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/4 6 has already been arrested and the same has become infructuous. 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application with regard to Petitioner No. 6 stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 342, 323, 307, 354B, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 6. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members with lathi, farsa and iron rod due to which they sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched cash and gold jewellery from informant and his family members. 7.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, simple maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8090 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 3/4 no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 16.11.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40730 of 2020. 8. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and claim based on parity, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 is allowed. 10. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District- Madhubani in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 268 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8090 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 4/4
11. With the aforesaid directions, this application stands disposed of. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T