RAJVEER GURJAR S/O RAMSINGH GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/699/2026 · 2026-05-21
Praveer Bhatnagar
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8265 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8265 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1111/2026 Surendra Gurjar @ Bala Son Of Chajuram Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Tigriya, Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present In Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Appellant Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Ramsahay Meena Son Of Manna Ram Meena, Aged About 74 Years, Resident Of Devi Ki Dhani Ramniwaspura, Chaksu, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan.
3. Kamal Kumar Son Of Ramsahay Meena, Resident Of Devi Ki Dhani Ramniwaspura, Chaksu, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 699/2026 Rajveer Gurjar S/o Ramsingh Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bhojpura, Police Station Sikandara, District Dausa, At Present Tenant At Plot No. B-13, Godavari Apartment, Sector 26, Pratap Nagar, Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Ramsahay Meena, S/o Mannaram Meena, R/o Devi Ki Dhani, Ramniwaspura, Police Station Chaksu, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1112/2026 Raju Gurjar Son Of Jagdish Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Thoni Ramlaxmanpura, Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan (At Present In Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Appellant Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Ramsahay Meena Son Of Manna Ram Meena, Resident Of Devi Ki Dhani Ramniwaspura, Chaksu, Jaipur City
[2026:RJ-JP:21606] (2 of 4) [CRLAS-1111/2026] (South), Rajasthan.
3. Kamal Kumar Son Of Ramsahay Meena, Resident Of Devi Ki Dhani Ramniwaspura, Chaksu, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore, Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma, Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 21/05/2026
1. These instant appeals have been filed under Section 14A(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on behalf of the appellant, who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.119/2026 dated 02.03.2026, registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 110 and 140(3) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 30.03.2026 and 25.03.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Cases, Jaipur Metro-I whereby, the bail applications preferred under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the appellants were rejected.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have falsely been implicated in the case. Counsel for the accused-appellants further submits that prima-facie offence under Section 110 of BNS is not made out. The injuries sustained to the injured were found to be simple blunt and grievous in nature. There are no injuries on the vital part. It is also contended
[2026:RJ-JP:21606] (3 of 4) [CRLAS-1111/2026] that the accused-appellants are in custody since long, charge- sheet has already been submitted before the concerned Court and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the appeals of accused-appellants may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the notice served upon the respondent No.2. No one has turned up on behalf of the respondent No.2.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the
arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants. 5. The injuries sustained to the injured were found to be simple blunt and grievous in nature. There are no injuries on the vital part. The allegation against the appellants are omnibus in nature and not specific. The accused-appellants are in custody since long, the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, I deem it just and proper to allow these appeals. 6. Consequently, these instant appeals are allowed. The impugned order dated 30.03.2026 and 25.03.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Cases, Jaipur Metro-I are hereby set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellants namely: 1. Surendra Gurjar @ Bala Son Of Chajuram Gurjar, 2. Rajveer Gurjar S/o Ramsingh Gurjar and 3. Raju Gurjar Son Of Jagdish Gurjar, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.119/2026 dated 02.03.2026, registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South), shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each
[2026:RJ-JP:21606] (4 of 4) [CRLAS-1111/2026] to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-appellants on bail. 7. The accused-appellants are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused- appellants and shall send the presence report of the accused-appellants on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. 8. The accused-appellants are also directed to submit their present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from their release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the appellants changes their address or mobile number, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court.
In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-appellants for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/92-94