Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8260 (RAJ)

RUP CHAND YADAV S/O SHRI NANDRAM YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9277/2026 · 2026-05-26

Anand Sharma V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9277/2026 Rup Chand Yadav S/o Shri Nandram Yadav, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Dahmi Kankardopa, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 26/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue with regard to recognition of qualification of Bachelor of Physical Education has already been examined by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 27.11.2025 passed in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.152/2023 (Bimala Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that in view of above, the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Competent Authority, in the light of aforesaid judgment, which was decided by the Competent Authority by a speaking and reasoned order. [2026:RJ-JP:22333] (2 of 2) [CW-9277/2026] 3. Mr. Devansh Sharma, learned Deputy Government Counsel, appeared and accepted notices on behalf of the respondents and did not oppose the aforesaid limited prayer. 4. In view of the consensus arrived at between the learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the Competent Authority, which shall be considered and decided by a speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 34/DAKSH