Vikash Kumar Neeraj @ Vicky @ Biky v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./1574/2026 · 2026-04-16
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8259 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8259 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1574 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Neeraj @ Vicky @ Biky Son of Sheo Pujan Yadav @ Shiv Pujan Prasad Yadav Resident of Mohalla - Turkwalia, Ps- Chapra Muffasil, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saran Cyber P.S. Case No. 363/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 75, 77, 78, 79, 356(2), 352, 351(3), 351(4) of B.N.S. and Sections 66, 67(A) of I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged of stealing personal photographs of the informant, hacking her e- mail and coercing her into a an illicit relationship and recording obscene videos and later creating fake social media accounts to send obscene content to her relatives and blackmailing her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1574 of 2026(4) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.09.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner has been forwarding private photographs of the petitioner to her relatives and friends.
6. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T