Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8259 (GAU)

SRI SIMANTA DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/613/2026 · 2026-06-15

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010121572026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/613/2026 SRI SIMANTA DAS SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI, ASSAM 2: SRI PABAN DAS SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSAM 3: SRI MONTU DAS SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SRI UMARAM DAS S/O-LATE SUSEN DAS R/O-SONARIBARI GAON. P.O-KAMALABARI P.S- MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, MS. M PATIRI,B SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Pet./804/2026 Page No.# 2/3 SRI SIMANTA DAS AND 2 ORS. SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSAM 2: SRI PABAN DAS SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSAM 3: SRI MONTU DAS SON OF SRI GATHIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF SONARIBARI GAON P.O- KAMALABARI P.S-MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM 2:SRI UMARAM DAS S/O-LATE SUSEN DAS R/O-SONARIBARI GAON. P.O-KAMALABARI P.S- MAJULI DIST-MAJULI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. P J SAIKIA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 16.06.2026 Heard Mr. P J Saikia, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr.B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This application has been filed praying for correction of inadvertent typographical error appearing in the order dated 08.06.2026 passed by this Court in Crl. Pet./804/2026. 3. In the aforesaid order, “Sessions Case No.04/2017” has been mentioned, whereas it should have been “Sessions Case No.30/2026”. Page No.# 3/3 4. The typographical error stands corrected. 5. Henceforth, the case No. i.e. “Sessions Case No.04/2017” shall be read as Sessions Case No.30/2026”. 6. This order shall form a part of the order dated 08.06.2026 passed by this Court in Crl. Pet./804/2026. With the aforesaid direction, the IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant