Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8256 (CHH)

LOKNATH PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/835/2026 · 2026-02-24

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9914 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 835 of 2026 Loknath Patel S/o Shri Neelkanth Patel Aged About 47 Years R/o Santoshi Ward, Vrindavan Basti, Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Raipur Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Bhatapara-Balodabazar, District Bhatapara-Balodabazar Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Bhatapara District Bhatapara-Balodabazar Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar, Bhatapara District Bhatapara-Balodabazar Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Mandar Rastogi, Adv. through VC. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Govt. Adv. AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.02.27 16:55:50 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 25-2-2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 15-7-2025 passed by the respondent No. 5/Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhatapara, District Bhatapara-Balodabajar, whereby mutation order passed in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled. Since the order passed by the respondent No. 5/ Tehsildar is appellable before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition invoking extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the superior authority to respondent No. 5 under the relevant provisions of the CG Land Revenue Code, 1959. 2. This writ petition is dismissed with aforesaid liberty. 3. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak