Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8255 (JHR)

RUPAK KUMAR RUP ALIAS RUPAK KUMAR SAHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10710/2025 · 2026-02-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4524 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10710 of 2025 ----- Rupak Kumar Rup @ Rupak Kumar Saha, son of Dayanand Prasad @ Dayanand Saha, resident of village Bare Tola, Kalyanchak, PO Kalyanchak, PS Rajmahal, District Sahibganj … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. R. Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, APP …...... 03 /17.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 376/328/417/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. It is alleged that this petitioner has committed rape upon the victim. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 5. From the prosecution story prima-facie the story put forth by the informant is that she is a married lady and running a shop. This petitioner came to the shop and thereafter entered the house and made her to smell something as a result of which she became unconscious thereafter, physical relationship was established. It has further been stated that this petitioner is threatening the victim to leave her husband. 6. In this context, I have gone through the case-diary. The statement of the child at paragraph no. 6 and the other witnesses at paragraph nos. 7 and 8 are very important. They have stated that she was having some affair with this petitioner. They were 2026:JHHC:4524 2 seen moving around in the localities and in the market also for which she was rebuked but she did not mend herself. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal (Mahila) PS Case No. 31 of 2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner, having sufficient landed property in his own name within the State of Jharkhand. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 18.02.2026