[2026:RJ-JP:21621] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7899/2026 Dinesh S/o Shri Pappuram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Dayalpura Service Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur Rural Raj. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 21/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 101/2026 registered at Police Station Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2026; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused- petitioner; that the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:21621] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7899/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there is one another criminal antecedent registered against the accused- petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2026; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Dinesh S/o Shri Pappuram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application [2026:RJ-JP:21621] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7899/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 85/KAVISH