Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8251 (JHR)

NABIRUL SK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1623/2025 · 2026-01-19

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1270-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1623 of 2025 Nabirul Sk., aged about 38 years, S/O- Mahram Sk., resident of Santoshpur, P.O – Banrampur, P.S – Murarai, Dist. – Bribhum (West Bengal). … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … Respondent ------- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------- For the Appellant : Mr. Din Dayal Saha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha , A.P.P. ------- Order No.03/Dated- 19.01.2026 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1623 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Din Dayal Saha, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.11.2025 passed in A.B.P. No.483 of 2025 by learned Sessions Judge, Pakur arising out of Pakur Town P.S. (Malpahari O.P.) Case No.182 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that on a secret information, a raid was conducted by the police and two persons on a motorcycle had managed to flee away and on search of the motorcycle, some sacks were found which contained gelatins and 1148 pieces of gelatin sticks were recovered and seized. 4. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated only on the basis of suspicion. It has further been submitted that the appellant is an employee of Ghudha Sk., who has an existing explosive license. 5. Learned A.P.P. has submitted that the appellant has been implicated on the basis of a secret information. 6. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant, we while setting aside the order dated 26.11.2025 passed in 2026:JHHC:1270-DB A.B.P. No.483 of 2025 by learned Sessions Judge, Pakur arising out of Pakur Town P.S. (Malpahari O.P.) Case No.182 of 2025, direct the appellant to surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of four weeks and on his surrender, the learned Court below shall release him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Learned S.D.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur Town P.S. (Malpahari O.P.) Case No.182 of 2025. 7. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated: 19th January, 2026 Sachin/