DIVYANSH @ DIVYAM @ CHOTU PAHLWAN S/O SHRI SHISHPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/1065/2026 · 2026-05-21
Sangeeta Sharma
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21648] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 1065/2026 Divyansh @ Divyam @ Chotu Pahlwan S/o Shri Shishpal, Resident Of Dhani Palyawali, Dabla, District Sikar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Accused-Appellant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Vijaydeep Meena S/o Dharampal Meena, Age 25 Years, Resident Dabla Patan, Police Station Dabla, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 21/05/2026
1. This criminal appeal has been filed on behalf of the accused- appellant under Section 14(A) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with FIR No. 173/2025 registered at Police Station Dabla, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1) & 3(5) of BNS, Section 3 & 25(6) of Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the accused-appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since long. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-appellant
[2026:RJ-JP:21648] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1065/2026] in custody and, therefore, prays to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-appellant that the accused-appellant is behind the bars since 02.02.2026; charge-sheet against the accused-appellant has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-appellant; that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life; that the co-accused persons namely, Sachin Gurjar, Dinesh Gurjar @ Tiger and Vikash @ Vicky have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.05.2026, 28.03.2026 & 28.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Appeal Nos. 407/2026, 406/2026 & 277/2026 respectively. Hence, this Court without commenting anything on merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
5. Consequently, this instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 02.05.2026 passed by Special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sikar in Bail Application (CIS) No. 319/2026 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Divyansh @ Divyam @ Chotu Pahlwan S/o Shri Shishpal be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The accused-appellant shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
[2026:RJ-JP:21648] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1065/2026] (ii) The accused-appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the law. (iii) The accused-appellant shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellant shall be liable to be cancelled.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for the decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/101