Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 82483 (MAD)

M.D.Osim Ansari v. State Represented by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/36037/2025 · 2026-01-30

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 M.D.Osim Ansari S/o.Rustam Ansari, Chanda Village, Thakur Gangti Post, Mirzachowki Godda District, Jharkhand State. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police Sankari Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 88/2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Spl.C.C.No. 131/2025 pending on the file of the Learned 4- Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer,Special Court under EC Act Salem and pass other orders.. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sudhanthiran Mohamed Abbas For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Gopinath, Govt Advocate ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.03.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.88 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that based on a secret information, the respondent police went to the spot and found that the petitioner along with other accused and was in possession of 22 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence a case was registered by the respondent police. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that only based on the confession given by the co-accused the petitioner has been implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that the quantity involved in this case is commercial quantity. 5. In view of the above facts and the quantity involved in this case is very huge and twin conditions in section 37 of NDPS Act is not satisfied, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed . 30-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No smn To 1. The Inspector of Police Sankari Police Station, Salem District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. SMN CRL OP No. 36037 of 2025 30-01-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis