NTPC Ltd. Vs. Nand Lal & Ors. CMPs No. 11597 & 11599/2026 in RFA No. 45/2015 21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 11597/2026 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10, read with Section 151 CPC has been filed by the applicant for deletion of name of respondent No. 7, Santi. As per the applicant, respondent No. 7 has expired on 12.02.2020 and left behind the legal heirs, as mentioned in the application, who are already on record. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of applicant, Raj Kumar, death certificate of the deceased as well as legal heirs certificate. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/appellant, under instructions received from the original counsel, states that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that the legal heirs of ….2... deceased respondent No. 7 are already on record, the same is allowed and name of deceased respondent No. 7, Santi, is ordered to be deleted from array of parties, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 11599/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 1 to 6, for release of the award amount, alongwith up- to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/appellant, under instructions received from the original counsel, states that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that …..3…. till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 1 to 6, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-8 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 21st May, 2026 (raman)