Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:17288 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 7594 of 2024 Decided on : 15.05.2026 Sh. Naresh Ranaut …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In light of the fact that there is already an adjudication in favour of the petitioner in the earlier writ petition filed by him for the grant of consequential benefits, this petition praying for the same relief is not maintainable.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court by way of an execution petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:17288 accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 15, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)