[2026:RJ-JP:22600] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 7516/2026 Rishab Ranjan @ Rishab Ranjan S/o Shri Dileep Kumar Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Bariyapur Bazar, Thana Bariyapur, District Mungar, Bihar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain with Mr. Bhuwnesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 27/05/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.949/2025 registered with the Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 319(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 10 of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation, as has been levelled against the present petitioner, is that he entered the examination room to appear as a dummy candidate for one Abhishek Meena, however, before starting of the examination, he was caught. He further submits that the person in whose place, the petitioner was to appear as a [2026:RJ-JP:22600] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7516/2026] dummy candidate, that is, Ahishek Meena, has already been enlarged on bail by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate No.18, Sanganer Jaipur Metropolitan-I on 24.04.2026. He further submits that co-accused, Gautam Kumar @ Goti, who is said to be the mediator and arranged the dummy candidate, has already been enlarged on bail by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge No.10, Jaipur Metropolitan-I. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the second bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 27.02.2026 with liberty to file fresh bail application after examination of the complainant witness. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this third bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 5. It has been brought to the notice of the Court that the complainant witness is not appearing for his examination before the learned Trial Court for last three occasion, even after service of summons. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the allegations against the petitioner and more particularly the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail and the complainant is not turning up for his examination for last two to three dates, this Court [2026:RJ-JP:22600] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7516/2026] without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. This third bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 37/ARTI SHARMA