KRISHAN AMARNATH KOHLI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/3303/2025 · 2026-03-31
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 824 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 824 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15005-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3302 of 2025
1. Premanand Mahesh Risbud S/o Mahesh Janardan Risbud Aged About 42 Years R/o 1034/2, Annapoorna, Canal Road, Model Colony, Distt. Pune, Maharashtra. 2. Shushant Duryodhan Khade S/o Duryodhan Khade Aged About 35 Years R/o 94 Rohidas Nagar, Ped, Distt. Sangli, Maharashtra. 3. Sanjiv Kumar Verma S/o Amar Chand Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o Flat No. 1b, 4 Tilak Road, Deshapriya Park, Sarat Bose Road, P.O. Sarat Bose Road, Distt. Kalkata, West Bengal. --- Petitioner(s) versus
1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Pandri, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Rounak Goyal S/o Pradeep Goyal Aged About 25 Years Proprietor M/s Bharat Automotive, Ground Floor, Usha Estate, Near Mova Over Bridge, P.S. Pandri, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 3303 of 2025
1. Krishan Amarnath Kohli S/o Amarnath Kohli Aged About 56 Years R/o Flat No. V-51/2, Survey No. 40,41,59, Forest Colony, Kharadi, District - Pune Maharashtra
2. Pankaj Sonalkar S/o Uttam Sonalkar Aged About 64 Years R/o C 4/703, Bramha Suncity, Wadgaon Sheri, Kalyani Nagar, Pune, District - Pune Maharashtra BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.04.04 11:00:44 +0530
2
3. Sunil Nilkanth Kulkarni S/o Nilkanth Kulkarni Aged About 46 Years R/o 9 Green Park, C-202, Behind Shinde High School, Sahakar Nagar 2, Parvati, District - Pune Maharashtra
4. Santosh Kumar Singh S/o Lal Babu Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o A 2, Flat No. 303, Kumar Prospera, Magarpatta City Road, Hadapsar, District - Pune Maharashtra
5. Keerthi Kiran Gautham S/o B Chandra Mouli Aged About 36 Years R/o F1-33, Citadel Society, B T Kawade Road, District - Pune Maharashtra
---Petitioner(s) versus
1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Pandri, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Rounak Goyal S/o Pradeep Goyal Aged About 25 Years Proprietor - M/s. Bharat Automotive, Ground Floor, Usha Estate, Near Mova Over Bridge, P.S. - Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 2667 of 2025 Kapil Chandrakant Shelke S/o Chandrakant Nivrutti Shelke Aged About 39 Years R/o Flat No. 9, Sagar Apartment, Gawade Colony, Opp. Tata Motors, Chinchawad, Pune City, District - Pune Mahrashtra
---Petitioner(s) versus
1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Pandri, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
2.
Rounak Goyal S/o Pradeep Goyal Aged About 25 Years Proprietor - M/s. Bharat Automotive, Ground Floor, Usha Estate, Near Mova Over Bridge, P.S. - Pandri, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
---Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
3 For Petitioners : Mr. Keshav Dewang, Advocate in CRMP No. 3302 of 2025, Mr. D.K. Gwalre, Advocate in CRMP Nos. 2667 of 2025 & 3303 of 2025. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate in CRMP No. 2667 of 2025. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
01 .04.2026
1. Heard Mr. Keshav Dewangan, learned counsel for the petitioners in CRMP No. 3302 of 2025 and Mr. D.K. Gwalre, learned counsel for the petitioners in CRMP Nos. 2667 of 2025 & 3303 of 2025. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State in all the cases and Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2 in CRMP No. 2667 of 2025.
2. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
“3.1 allow the instant petition; 3.2 graciously be pleased to quash the impugned FIR bearing Crime No. 19 of 2025 dated 20.01.2025 registered at Police Station Pandri, District Raipur (C.G.) for commission of alleged offence punishable
4 under Sections 120-B, 409, 420 of the IPC and the consequential criminal proceeding, if any, qua the petitioners herein in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in CRMP No. 2667 of 2025 submits that a settlement has been arrived at between petitioner,
namely Kapil
Chandrakant
Shelke,
and complainant/respondent No. 2, Rounak Goyal, who is stated to have received the agreed amount pursuant to the said settlement. It is further submitted that the remaining petitioners are Directors of different Companies and are not parties to the said settlement. The settlement agreement dated 15.10.2025, entered into between petitioner, Kapil Chandrakant Shelke, and respondent No. 2, Rounak Goyal, has been annexed along with the petitions. It is further submitted that the original settlement agreement is in the possession of petitioner, Kapil Chandrakant Shelke.
4.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 is present; however, he does not acknowledge or confirm the said settlement at this stage.
5. In view of the above, the Investigation Officer, Police Station Pandri, District Raipur (C.G.), is directed to verify the authenticity and validity of the alleged compromise arrived at between petitioner, Kapil Chandrakant Shelke, and the complainant/respondent No. 2, Rounak Goyal, and thereafter submit a report in accordance with law before the competent Court after due verification of the settlement dated
15.10.2025. The said report shall also take into consideration the role of
5 the remaining petitioners, who are also arrayed as accused in the present case, and shall be submitted within a period of four weeks from today. The interim protection granted earlier shall continue for a further period of four weeks from today.
6. The Superintendent of Police, Raipur, shall ensure due compliance with the directions issued by this Court.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands
disposed of.
8. Learned State counsel is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent of Police, Raipur, for necessary information. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan