Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 82307 (MAD)

GEETHA v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR

WP/1844/2026 · 2026-02-03

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 1844 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 1844 of 2026 and WMP.No.1936 of 2026 Geetha, W/o. Rathinam, No. 18, North Street, Kalanagar, Villupuram 605 602. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Registrar District Registrar office. Villupuram, Villupuram District. 2. The Sub Register Joint 1, Sub Register office, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 3. Shri Ram Finance limited Rep. by its Manager K.Arumugam, Villupuram Branch, Villupuram. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1844 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 cancelation of Mortgage Deed in Document No. 3934/2024, dated 30.12.2024 Survey No. 362/B34A1A1A1A1A1, Villupuram Joint 1, Sub Register office. For Petitioner: Mr. S.Deivasigamani For Respondents: Mr.U.Baranidharan, Spl. G.P. for R1 & R2 ORDER The petitioner seeks cancellation of mortgage deed dated 30.12.2024 bearing document no.3934/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen and that her son has been suffering from mental illness for a few years. It is also stated that the mortgage was executed in relation to a business loan and that the petitioner’s son is not capable of doing any business. 3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for respondents 1 & 2. He points out that a deed of simple mortgage has been executed by the petitioner in favour of the third respondent. 4. The record reveals that deed of simple mortgage dated 30.12.2024 was executed by the petitioner in favour of the third respondent. The said mortgage has been created as security for a loan of Rs.20 lakhs. In these circumstances, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1844 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the petition seeking cancellation of the mortgage deed is completely misconceived. Unless the petitioner discharges the loan and redeems the mortgage, the relief requested for by the petitioner cannot be granted. It is, however, open to the petitioner to reach out to the third respondent in relation to the discharge of the loan on mutually acceptable terms. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03-02-2026 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kj To 1.The District Registrar District Registrar office. Villupuram, Villupuram District. 2.The Sub Register Joint 1, Sub Register office, Villupuram, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1844 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 1844 of 2026 and WMP.No.1936 of 2026 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis