[2026:RJ-JP:21680] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11825/2024 1. Chanchal Sharma D/o Shri Dharmveer Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of 367, Krishi Nagar, Pratap Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 2. Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramniwas Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of P.no. 1, Teja Vihar, Niwaru Link Road, Govindpura, Jaipur 3. Urvashi Kundara D/o Shri Ramphool Kundara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of G-89, Indra Nagar, Jhalan Dungri, Phase-2, Jaipur 4. Nitish Kumar Verma S/o Shri Banshi Dhar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Talab Ke Pass, Pilani (Rural), Jhunjhunu 5. Asha Meena D/o Shri Anant Ram Meena W/o Shri Pawan Meena, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of E-56, Maharaja Agrasen Nagar, Bas Bilwa, Sanganer, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Through Its Director, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur 4. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Through Its Registrar, C- 7A, Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Bani Park, Jaipur -302016 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15913/2024 Deepak Kataria S/o Shri Rajesh Kataria, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Doomroli, Tehsil Neemrana Dist.- Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Through Its Director, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur. 4. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Through Its Registrar, C- 7A, Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Bani Park, Jaipur- 302016 [2026:RJ-JP:21680] (2 of 3) [CW-11825/2024] ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16737/2024 1. Dinesh Kumar Verma S/o Durga Lal Dhobi, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of 52 Ab Hanuman City, Sitapura Indrapuri, Sanganer, Jaipur. 2. Vishnu Kumar S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 91, Kalyan Nagar 3Rd Tonk Road Sanganer Jaipur. 3. Dinesh Saini S/o Surjan Saini, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Baniya Ka Bas Chhitoli, Virat Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Rahul Gurjar S/o Babulal Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Khohra Kalan, Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Tamanna S/o Anand Yadav, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Shiv Colony, N.h-8, Kotputli, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Through Its Director, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur. 4. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Through Its Registrar, C- 7A, Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Bani Park, Jaipur- 302016. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Bharat Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/05/2026 1. Learned counsels appearing for the parties are in complete agreement that the issue involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by order dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in the case of Pinki Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of [2026:RJ-JP:21680] (3 of 3) [CW-11825/2024] Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17418/2016), wherein following directions have been given: "20. Accordingly, these writ petitions succeed and are allowed in the following terms: (i) It is declared that the Rajasthan Para Medical Council had no authority to deny registration to the petitioners and the denial was arbitrary and illegal. (ii) The respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the posts of Lab Technician/Assistant Radiographer pursuant to advertisement dated 10.10.2016, provided they are otherwise eligible and have secured suitable place in merit, while doing so no objection shall be raised on the ground that their registration with RPMC was not granted prior to last date of submission of application form. (iii) It is, however, clarified that the above direction shall apply only to those petitioners, who had duly submitted their application for registration with RPMC prior to last date prescribed for submitting application form under the advertisement dated 10.10.2016. (iv) Petitioners shall be accorded appointment in accordance with their merit position in the selection process. Upon appointment of the eligible and entitled petitioners, they shall be granted notional seniority and notional pay fixation from the date persons lower in merit to them were appointed. However, they shall not be entitled to claim back wages or arrears of salary for the period prior to their actual joining. Necessary compliance shall be made accordingly by the Respondents within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order." 2. In the view of above consensus arrived at between learned counsels for both the parties, the present writ petitions are allowed in the same terms and with the same directions as given by this Court in the case of Pinki Yadav (supra). 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 135, 172-173/DAKSH