Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2026 DAILYLAW 823 (MAN)

Pukrambam Radhapyari and 2 ors v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS

MC(WP(C))/668/2026 · 2026-08-26

Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C)) No. 668 of 2026 (Ref:- WP(C) No. 220 of 2026) Pukrambam Radhapyari & ors. … Applicants Vs. State of Manipur & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 27-08-2026 Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants submitted that in view of the order passed today in the connected writ petition, the present application may be closed as not pressed. Recording the submission made by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants, the present application is hereby closed as not pressed. JUDGE Devananda IN. 63 SHOUGRAKPA M DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.08.28 11:27:01 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 220 of 2026 Pukrambam Radhapyari & ors. … Petitioners Vs. State of Manipur & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 27-08-2026 Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Y. Nikhil, learned counsel appeared on behalf of petitioners; Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and Mr. Gailinpou, learned counsel representing the Advocate on record appeared on behalf of respondent No. 4 through VC platform. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks three weeks’ time for filing counter affidavit. It has been submitted by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners that as the petitioners are all very aged persons and they are seeking for re-calculation of their pensionary benefits, an early date may be fixed. In view of the submission made above, registry is directed to list these cases again on 21-09-2026 instead of 21-10-2026. Registry is directed to reflect the name of all the counsel appearing for the parties in the cause list. JUDGE Devananda IN. 64