M/S. SUPREME LAUNDRY SERVICES JOINT VENTURE PVT. LTD., THR. CHIEF EX. OFFICER AND AUTH. SIGNATORY v. SHRI. PRASHANT K. PAJAI AND ANOTHER
CP/265/2026 · 2026-09-10
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8225 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8225 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CP-265-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.265 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6405 OF 2023 (D) [M/s Supreme Laundry Services Joint Venture Pvt. Ltd., Ajni, Nagpur Vs. Shri Prashant K. Pajai and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Shri Bhushan Mohata, Counsel for Petitioner. Shri C.J. Dhumane, Counsel for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS
, JJ.
D ATE
: 10 th SEPTEMBER, 2026
1. As per the order of this Court dated 2nd February, 2026, the decision is taken on the representation of the petitioner. However, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the reasons are not recorded on each of the issues raised in the representation.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner has filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 10th July, 2026, which, according to the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, is the compliance of the order dated 2nd February, 2026.
3. Since the compliance of the order dated 2nd February, 2026 is pointed out, that is in respect of taking decision on the representation of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that it cannot be said that there is a willful disobedience, if certain observations are not as per the order of this Court.
4. In the circumstances, this contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all these points in the writ petition. However, we make it clear that in the said writ petition if we arrive at a conclusion that the directions in Para 5 of the order dated 2nd February, 2026 as regards recording reasons on each of the issues are not complied with intentionally, we may proceed in the said writ 2026:BHC-NAG:12108-DB
2 CP-265-2026.odt petition against the respondents therein under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) LANJEWAR