Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8223 (BOM)

SARITA W/O ARUN NARNAWARE v. ARUN HARISHCHANDRA NARNAWARE

CAO/697/2026 · 2026-09-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 14 cao697.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO.697/2026 WITH FCA ST.NO.14734/2026 Sarita w/o Arun Narnaware ..vs.. Arun s/o Harishchandra Narnaware Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court' s or Judge' s Order Coram, appearances, Court' s Orders or directions and Registrar' s order Shri P.A.Dubey, Counsel for the Applicant. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE & RAJ D.WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026. 1. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant/appellant is seeking condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the applicant/appellant, who is a lady and already suffering from physically and mentally due to desertion, she was not well and, therefore, she could not approach counsel to prefer the appeal and, therefore, delay of 14 days is caused. 4. Despite service of the Notice, none appears for the respondent. 5. Considering reasons mentioned in the application, which appear to be sufficient and satisfactory, the delay is condoned. 6. The application is disposed of. 7. The appeal be registered. 8. On registration of the appeal, Notice be issued to the respondent. 2026:BHC-NAG:12139-DB 2 14 cao697.26.odt 9. The appellant is permitted to serve the respondent by all modes of services and shall file an affidavit of service of the Notice on record. 10. Stand over to 28.10.2026. [JUDGE] [JUDGE] !! BrWankhede !! Signed by: Mr. B. R. Wankhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 15/09/2026 10:37:39