Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8222 (ALL)

AMAR SINGH YADAV @ PILLI PRADHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/9727/2026 · 2026-09-17

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9727 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Karan Michu, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant, states that the applicant has been arrested and this application has become infructuous. 2. Dismissed as infructuous. September 18, 2026 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar, Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Amar Singh Yadav @ Pilli Pradhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad