Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 82206 (MAD)

A.Nagarajan v. The District Collector

WP/2761/2026 · 2026-02-03

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 2761 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 2761 of 2026 and WMP.No.3016 of 2026 A.Nagarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai , Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thandarapattu Taluk, Thiruvannamalai district 3. The Tahsildar, Thandarapattu Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.11.2025 and restore the survey stone to its https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2761 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 original boundary line demarcated on the basis of the survey done at the instance of the petitioner for the property admeasuring 2.16 hectares comprised in S.Nos. 34/3A2A3, 34/3A2B and 34/6 situated at Perungalathur Village, Thandrapet Taluk, Thriuvannamalai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Nandhagopal For Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.) The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.11.2025 and restore the survey stone to its original boundary line demarcated on the basis of the survey stone at the instance of the petitioner. 2. The adjudication of the very prayer involved in this writ petition is a disputed question of law, which cannot be adjudicated by the writ Court and furthermore, in respect of the same property, there was a proceeding under Land Encroachment Act and the Tahsildar passed an order on 10.11.2025. Under these circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2761 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. Thus, this Writ Petition is dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 03-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN To 1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai , Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thandarapattu Taluk, Thiruvannamalai district 3. The Tahsildar, Thandarapattu Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2761 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. KKN WP No. 2761 of 2026 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis