Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 822 (UTT)

SUMAN CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/329/2025 · 2026-01-08

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:345 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/329/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is serving as teacher in Sanskrit School, run by Committee of Management. 3. According to the petitioner, as per Government Order dated 25.03.2021, teachers serving in Sanskrit School have been categorised in three category and as per the classification made in that government order, petitioner is entitled to salary of Rs. 30,000/- per month, while she is being paid Rs. 15000/- per month. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Committee of Management has recommended for paying Rs. 30,000/- as salary to the petitioner each month. 5. Reliefs sought in this writ petition are as follow: “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to comply with the Government Order dated 25.03.2021 by increasing the remuneration of the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 30,000/- per month as directed by the Government Order dated-25.03.2021. (ii) Issue a writ, rule order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to pay arrears of increased remuneration from the date of issuance of government order dated- 25.03.2021.” 2026:UHC:345 6. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation to the competent authority. He submits that petitioner be permitted to make fresh representation for claiming benefit of Government Order dated 25.03.2021. 7. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if writ petition is decided in terms of the prayer made by petitioner. 8. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation. If she makes representation within ten days from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within three months thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.01.2026 Mahinder/