HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 183 of 2012 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. Neither the learned counsels for the applicant are present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case whereas Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 14 is present. 3. The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Aslam Beg, Amit Bose, Prachi Shukla, Shashank Shukla, V V Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : D.R. Misra, Jyotinjay Verma, Neeraj Chaurasia, R.P. Verma, Uday Veer Singh (Manish Kumar,J.) Radhey Shyam Yadav .....Applicant(s) S.N. Singh Posted As District Basic Shiksha Adhikari And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench