Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8215 (BOM)

VIKRAMSINHA BALASAHEB SAWANT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION AND TEXTILES AND ORS.

WP/4552/2026 · 2026-09-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

904-WP-4552-2026=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4552 OF 2026 Vikramsinha Balasaheb Sawant … Petitioner Vs. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Dept. Of Co-operation And Textiles and Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Surel Shah, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Ishaan Kapse for the Petitioner Mr. Ruturaj P. Pawar for Respondent No.2. Mr. Manoj A. Patil a/w Ankita D. Mali for Respondent No.3. Mr. Santosh A. Jadhav, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 6 – State. …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P. C. : . After hearing for some time, when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant the relief, learned Senior Counsel Mr. Surel Shah representing the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order as is permissible in law. 2. It is brought to my notice by the learned Senior Counsel that the objections against respondent no.5 for his representation of the respondent no.4 - member society as well as his candidature to contest the election be kept open. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2026.09.12 16:23:41 +0530 904-WP-4552-2026=.doc 3. The petitioner has been given liberty to avail the remedy as is permissible in law which would contemplate the challenge on all the grounds including future candidature to contest the election. 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty as sought for and as clarified by this Court. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2