Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 82101 (MAD)

DWILLIAMS v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

/483/2026 · 2026-01-21

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.483 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.483 of 2026 D.Williams ... Petitioner Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Arani Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.724 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy for Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Section 318(4) of BNS Act, 2023 r/w 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 in Crime No724 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.483 of 2026 2. Earlier, this Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail petition on 06.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.30245 of 2025 on the following reasons: “ 6. On perusal of the documents produced by the petitioner, it is seen that some of the certificates revealed that the petitioner had completed Master of Science in Counselling and Psychotheraphy, Diploma in Community Medical Service and Essential Drugs and he is a member of the Indian Natural Therapy council. However, the petitioner is neither an authorized nor a registered medical practitioner under Ayurveda nor under the Medical Council, and claiming himself to be an Ayurveda Doctor is misconceived. 7. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed”. 3. Now, the present petition has been filed without any change in circumstances after the dismissal of the petitioner’s earlier bail petition. This clearly shows that the petitioner has abused the process of law. Hence, I am not inclined to reconsider the earlier order. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.483 of 2026 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21.01.2026 Vv To 1. The Inspector of Police, Arani Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.483 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR , J. Vv Crl.O.P.No.483 of 2026 21.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis