Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8207 (BOM)

SUREKHA KANTA MAJREKAR v. SADANAND K MADGAONKAR

IA/139/2026 · 2026-09-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

908-IA-139-2026 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 544 OF 2001 Surekha Kanta Majrekar … Applicant V/s. Sadanand K Madgaonkar … Respondent Mr. Nilesh Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 11, 2026 P.C.: 1. Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, submits that, as regards the order passed yesterday, i.e. on 10 September 2026, he has no objection to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4. He further submits that he has taken instructions from his client and his client is ready to pay the costs as directed in paragraph 3 of the order dated 10 September 2026. 2. He further submits that, only by way of clarification, once the Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d), the status quo order passed by this Court on 28 November 2001 should stand revived. 3. Interim Application No. 1139 of 2024 stands allowed in adn 1 908-IA-139-2026 (C).docx terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d), subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, within a period of three weeks from today. 4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. 5. It is clarified that the order dated 28 November 2001 passed in the present proceedings granting status quo as of 22 October 2001 stands revived automatically. 6. If the Second Appeal is ready for final hearing, the same be placed on the board for final hearing. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) adn 2