Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8204 (RAJ)

DEEPAK KUMAR S/O LATE DHANNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7998/2026 · 2026-05-21

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21663] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7998/2026 Deepak Kumar S/o Late Dhannalal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Nangal Tappa, P.s. Bagad Tiraha, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Ms. SwadhaBhargava HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 379/2022 registered at Police Station Kotwali District Alwar for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 504 and 307 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the petitioner and the complainant have arrived at amicable settlement and the written compromise is annexed as Annexure-3. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:21663] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7998/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner and complainant have entered into compromise and if the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner is allowed then the complainant has no objection. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and custodial interrogation of the accused- petitioner is not required, without expressing anything on merits / demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Deepak Kumar S/o Late Dhannalal, in connection with FIR No. 379/2022 registered at Police Station Kotwali District Alwar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of concerned trial court on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for trial as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 113/ashu/416