Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8200 (CAL)

HALADHAR SARDAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/495/2026 · 2026-02-26

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 25 February 26, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 495 of 2026 Partly Allowed An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Garhbeta P.S. Case No.04 of 2026 dated 03.01.2026 under Sections 329(3)/109/115(2)/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Haladhar Sardar and another … petitioners Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati Mr. Sunayan Ghosh Ms. Swastika Chowdhury Ms. Ilika Nag Mr. Avijit Chatterjee … for the petitioners Mr. Soumyo Basu Roy Chowdhury Mr. Prasun Dutta … for the State Ms. Pinki Chakraborty … for the de facto complainant Heard learned counsels for the parties. The prosecution case is that a grievous injury was inflicted on the victim. He suffered fracture of the left elbow. Although the victim and the local witnesses have implicated all the accused in the same breath, it was stated in the FIR lodged by the victim that the particular blow was given by the petitioner No.1. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, while I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.2, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner No.1 (Haladhar Sardar) is rejected. 2 In the event of arrest, the petitioner No.2 (Laxmikanta Saha) shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on the further conditions that the petitioner No. 2 shall cooperate with the investigation, shall meet the investigating officer once a week till submission of report in final form and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)