VIJENDRA KUMAR S/O VISHWAJEET v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4479/2026 · 2026-05-21
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8194 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8194 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21565] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4479/2026 Vijendra Kumar S/o Vishwajeet, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Dhani Baraniya Wali, Dhani Divrala, Police Station Ajitgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/05/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.422/2025 registered at Police Station-Newai, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present matter, a cross-case has also been registered against the complainant by the petitioner's side and owing to the same, the present petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case on false and concocted grounds. He further submits that in compliance with the earlier order dated 25.03.2026 passed by this
[2026:RJ-JP:21565] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4479/2026] Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is fully cooperating with the investigating. It is submitted that the prime accused Tanisha has already been granted the concession of anticipatory bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated
14.11.2025. The case of the present petitioner stands on a better footing as he was merely the driver of the vehicle involved in the present matter. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Vijendra Kumar S/o Vishwajeet, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and
[2026:RJ-JP:21565] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4479/2026] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/93