Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8193 (AP)

VEERA ANJANEYULU TANNERU v. SRI PARMESHWAR FUNKWAL

CC/1776/2026 · 2026-08-13

Sumathi Jagadam

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010224472026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1776/2026 Between: 1. VEERA ANJANEYULU TANNERU, CARRYING ON BUSINESS IN THE NAME AND STYLE OF M/S VEERA ANJANEYULU TANNERU, S/O KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, RESIDENT OF H.NO.12-11-1125, FLAT NO.202, MANIKANTA SIVA NILAYAM, BOUDHANAGAR, OPP POST OFFICE LANE, WARASIGUDA, SECUNDRABAD - 500061. REP. BY ITS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.BATTA AJAY KUMAR, S/O B.VENKATA RAMUDU. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PARMESHWAR FUNKWAL, GENERAL MANAGER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, WALTAIR DIVISION, DONDAPARTHY JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 530004. 2. SRI RAMA NARASIMHACHARI PATNALA, SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, WALTAIR DIVISION, DONDAPARTHY JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 530004. 3. SRI LALIT BOHRA, DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, WALTAIR DIVISION, DONDAPARTHY JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 530004 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them for violation of the 2 orders of this Honble court in l.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.22857 of 2025 dated n.11.2025 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to consider factual position of the case and consequently prays to dispense with personal appearance of the Contemnors and consequently to close the contempt petition in lieu of the strict compliance of the directions of the Honble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to consider factual position of the case and consequently prays to dispense with personal appearance of the Contemnors and consequently to close the contempt petition in lieu of the strict compliance of the directions of the Honble Court and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to consider factual position of the case and consequently prays to dispense with personal appearance of the Contemnors and consequently to close the contempt petition in lieu of the strict compliance of the directions of the Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUDEEPTHI POTLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUDEEPTHI POTLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22857 of 2025. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders passed by this Court dated 11.11.2025 in W.P. No.22857 of 2025 have been complied with and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. In view of the above, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 14.08.2026 SSA 4 39 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1776/2026 14.08.2026 SSA