Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8192 (CHH)

LOKESHWAR KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12873/2025 · 2026-03-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12829 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12873 of 2025 1. Lokeshwar Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ram Dayal Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Civil Lines, Ward No. 7, City Kotwali, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Veterinary Services, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Director Directorate Of Veterinary Services, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Joint Director Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Joint Director Treasury And Pension, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shahil Singh, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 17/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that while granting benefit of second time pay-scale, date of initial appointment of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned, which will affect SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.03.18 11:13:39 +0530 2 his future benefits. Petitioner submitted representations, Annexure P-7, before respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievance, however, the same are still pending consideration, therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to take decision on pending representations of petitioner at the earliest within specified time. 2. Learned State Counsel submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 4. On due consideration, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation before the respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition. If such a representation is submitted by petitioner, respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-